历史社会科学：联邦德国史学领军流派崛起之路

　[摘要]致力于批判社会史研究的联邦德国“历史社会科学”学派在20世纪70年代经历了一个迅速崛起的过程。比勒费尔德大学作为组织中心，为学派的创立和发展提供了机构空间和体制土壤。凡登赫克鲁佩莱希特出版社作为社会合作伙伴，为学派著述的出版发行提供了有力支持和便捷渠道。《史学批判研究》丛书和《历史与社会》杂志作为思想展示的舞台，促进了学派的人员凝聚、成果交流和理论传播。凭借这一时期掌握的体制性和社会性资源，历史社会科学学派形成了自己的学术共同体，构建起了学术交往网络，积累了学术资本，拥有了学科话语权，并且赢得了名誉、声望和影响力。它的成功表明，机构设置、学术出版和专业期刊等外在因素在史学流派的发展中发挥着举足轻重的作用。 
　　[关键词] 历史社会科学； 联邦德国； 组织机构； 学术共同体； 学术出版； 交往网络 
　　Abstract： The ″Historical Social Science School″ of West Germany， which mainly deals with critical social history， experienced its rapid rise in the 1970s. Besides the breakthrough in historiographical thoughts of its leading figures， the smooth operation of relevant academic activities also contributed to the rise of this School. There were three major driving forces behind its emergence， expansion and schooling. 
　　Firstly， Bielefeld University， as an institutional center， provided the organizational framework for the new historiographical school. Founded in 1969 and thus free of the shackles of the conservative tradition， Bielefeld University dedicated to facilitating the interdisciplinary research of humanities and social sciences and served as an ideal platform for the Historical Social Science School to carry out academic activities. In such a harmonious atmosphere， Bielefelds historians turned the university into a center of communication network and the largest professional training base for the School. Secondly， the Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht press （V&R）， as a social partner， strongly supported the academic publishing of the School. The V&R had enjoyed certain popularity within the academic circle of history and had no obvious political tendencies， which met the requirements of the historians of the new school. On the other hand， the V&Rs editors also wanted to exploit the market for books on history. Therefore， it is natural and easy for both sides to be in agreement. As a result， the three most representative works of the School were， and are， all published by the V&R. The cooperation mode between the V&R and the Historical Social Science School presented brand new features. The former became the first German press that built its image by echoing some kind of new historiographical trends while the latter became the first German historiographical school that entered into such an intimate relationship with a certain press that it labeled with its own name. Thirdly， the series Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft and the journal Geschichte und Gesellschaft， as showcases for thoughts， in an effective way promoted internally the cohesion and communication as well as externally the dissemination of the Historical Social Science School. In terms of the series Kritische Studien zur Geschichtswissenschaft， its lineament was deeply influenced by the editorinchiefs research areas， academic viewpoints and work networks as well as his personal relationships. It brought many research findings into the open， filled the gaps in the studies of social structures， social progresses and social groups， and thus helped the critical social history expand the boundaries and take root in the science of history. The journal Geschichte und Gesellschaft， on the other hand， is not only a remarkable result of the historiographical reform after the Second World War in West Germany， but also a noticeable symbol of the establishment of discourse power of the Historical Social Science School. At the same time of pointing the way for the School， this journal also built a fixed communication platform for the members and thereby helped them establish and expand their own academic community. By taking advantage of these two different types of publishing， namely the book series and journals， this School formed an active editorandauthor circle which furthered its own continuous development.