解释的真与真的解释——利科的文本与解释理论初探
上来”,而利科的解释理论所关注的恰恰正是如何回到这后一个问题。
[19] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 57.
[20] Paul Ricoeur, "Appropriation," in Hermeneutics and The Human Sciences --Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation, p.185.
[21] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 57.
[22] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 63.
[23] Paul Ricoeur Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Fort Worth: Texas Christian Univesity Press, 1976), p.94.
[24] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 58.
[25] Paul Ricoeur, ibid.
[26] vv. 27-28; NRSV
[27] See Roderick Nash, Wilderness and The American Mind, 3rd edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
[28] AL Gore, Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit (Boston:Houghton Miffin Campany, 1992).
[29] 关于这一问题的详细讨论,参见Theodore Hiebert, "The Human Vocation: Origins and Transformations in Christian Traditions," in Christianity and Ecology -- Seeking the Well-Being of Earth and Humans, ed. by D.T.Hessel and R.R.Ruether, (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000), pp. 135-154; John Passmore, Man’s Responsibility for
[19] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 57.
[20] Paul Ricoeur, "Appropriation," in Hermeneutics and The Human Sciences --Essays on Language, Action and Interpretation, p.185.
[21] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 57.
[22] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 63.
[23] Paul Ricoeur Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Fort Worth: Texas Christian Univesity Press, 1976), p.94.
[24] Paul Ricoeur, "What Is a Text?" p. 58.
[25] Paul Ricoeur, ibid.
[26] vv. 27-28; NRSV
[27] See Roderick Nash, Wilderness and The American Mind, 3rd edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
[28] AL Gore, Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit (Boston:Houghton Miffin Campany, 1992).
[29] 关于这一问题的详细讨论,参见Theodore Hiebert, "The Human Vocation: Origins and Transformations in Christian Traditions," in Christianity and Ecology -- Seeking the Well-Being of Earth and Humans, ed. by D.T.Hessel and R.R.Ruether, (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 2000), pp. 135-154; John Passmore, Man’s Responsibility for
Tags:
上一篇:人工智能与现今逻辑学的发展下一篇:因果关系与逻辑推理